Welcome to the Frontpage
toxic gas? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Steven Sust   
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 13:03

cryo-1I’m nowhere close to being an anesthesiologist, but I thought that this little bit of news was very interesting. This guy is apparently trying to use hydrogen sulfide (which I always thought was a very toxic gas) to place an animal’s body into a period of quiescence so that the natural inflammatory cascade/free radical formation/shock/death corollaries that typically follow severe trauma are prevented until someone fixes the primary pathophysiological cause. So far, he’s only been able to get it to work in animals and he admits there are multiple roadblocks to making this work in humans, but if he’s not a crackpot and continues his pathway of success up the evolutionary ladder then this could be pretty revolutionary in terms of how we manage any sort of trauma or code. If not, then it at least stimulates some interesting areas of research that might be able to refine his work and introduce follow-up work that could induce that quiescent state of suspended animation that we only read about in books or watch on TV.
good_batmanrobin_02
People always wonder how medicine thinks up these crazy meds(sildenafil citrate for ED) or molecules(botulinum toxin for wrinkle release) to use on patients, and I think that this could be one of those amazing discoveries that are in the making right now where people ask: “Who in the world thought this up?

Of course, the anti-medicine folks will still poo on this sort of thing and reject it, but I think that there are interesting connections with my area of interest(psychiatry).  I’ve heard many people(psych-agnostic and anti-psych) ask why psychiatry thinks that it’s a good idea to administer a medication when we don’t have a great grasp on how it all even works. That’s when I introduce the double blind placebo randomized control trial idea and how such trials can be helpful in establishing a role for therapeutic effect for any medical intervention despite only having theories for why it works. It’s a tragic truth of many parts of medicine(e.g. rheumatology), but it’s not uncommon for us to not know the exact mechanism of action for a medication, disease, or gene product even though we are fairly certain it has some sort of action. Fortunately, that is where science enters and we just wait until everything is eventually fleshed out. That’s probably not very encouraging to people when you say that, but gradual advancement/understanding of a beautifully elegant and complex machine like a human body is something that should at least (in my opinion) be acknowledged by everyone and nicely fits into a universe where not everything is well understood either. At some point, we all have to come to terms with how little we actually know, and if you’re lucky then you learn to enjoy snippets of scientific news as they are slowly uncovered every day.

More credit to dialytech

Last Updated on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 13:26
 
Kaneda... help me! PDF Print E-mail
Written by Steven Sust   
Thursday, 15 October 2009 10:25

akira-tetsuoI remember an old friend once obsessing over cybernetic implants and how awesome we were all going to be once that happened(we had all seen Akira by that time), but I was kinda skeptical in thinking that we’d all be dead by the time that came around. However, it seems like what we only saw in movies like Star Wars and Terminator is getting closer and closer. Some blue surgeons over at UMich have somehow figured out how to graft electrodes to peripheral nerve stumps to create not only anterograde motor control, but also retrograde sensory control in animals. That’s pretty frickin impressive!

Of course again, it’s only animals and we have no idea what long term safety or efficacy data looks like, but (much like the group that was able to replicate a live beating mouse heart from mouse stem cells) it’s still a great stride forward for neuroscience and cybernetics in general.

 

(Saw it on dailytech again)

Last Updated on Thursday, 15 October 2009 11:09
 
MRI and xenon PDF Print E-mail
Written by Steven Sust   
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:29

This isnt the first time i've heard of the name Alex Pines over at UC Berkeley. I remember my Georgetown O. Chem TA mentioning his name when we were talking about NMR/MRI stuff, and in true geek fashion I went to cyberstalk  research his work on the internet. Now 4 years later, I run into that name yet again and this time he and his group have happened upon something pretty incredible in my opinion. One of the common materials used in MR imaging is a gadolinium contrast agent which can be useful for picking up on many kinds of pathology(e.g. cancers which have tapped into their own blood vessels), but that is about as specific as it gets. What Dr. Pines and company have been working on seems to be a method of taking Xenon gas and "refining" it to the point where there is a relatively higher density of MR signal producing Xenon nuclei which can be inhaled by a patient and shuttled into bloodstream by diffusion through the alveolar membranes. This might sound kind of useless, but what if Dr. Pines were to tell you that it might be possible to hook xenon up with a biomarker or ligand that is specific for... whatever you want it to be. With some of his xenon hooked up to some ligands that have been cooking in the PET research domain for decades, maybe we are at an interesting time for noninvasive imaging that will also combine the superior imaging properties of MR with the specific metabolic imaging of PET(not that I have anything against PET/CT, but I just love the idea of MR so much more).

It's an interesting idea that is obviously still baking, but I think it bears some promise. I'd be curious to see how well the human lung does in the presence of xenon and also wonder if there's any truth to the internet suggestions of xenon gas acting as an anesthetic agent. Furthermore, I wonder whether or not the ligands would interact with other molecules, enzymes, and cells(e.g. immune system) yet still remain viable or change? Also, what are the long term effects/safety of having huffed on xenon for a little while and having it float around in your blood stream for a little bit? These are all a few of the bigger questions that can be answered in time as more research rolls into it.

In the near future, I think there is going to be a flurry of activity in companies trying to rush a product like this out to market where you could have an inhaled MRI Xenon contrast agent for those against IV's or maybe even make the claim that your MRI xenon contrast agent will stick to and highlight areas of lung cancer as small as 1 cubic millimeter. Unfortunately and understandably, clinical medicine is usually a few years behind the ball as efficacy and safety data accumulate(I dont care how fancy Dr. Pines's water bottle is because it aint as complex as a human body), but at least we're not as far behind as the legal domain when it comes to technology. Still, radiologists and oncologists might be looking at some of this exciting new stuff some time in the next 10 years if the efficacy and safety don't suck.

Credit goes to dailytech for spotting this first.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:23
 
e-stalking PDF Print E-mail
Written by Steven Sust   
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 10:05

I was sniffing around arstechnica and found this article entitled "How to break up in an online-world - and avoid e-stalkers." It's interesting to think about the possibility of being e-stalked because when I think of the internet I typically first think of the good things that have come from being more interconnected, but often forget all about the bad stuff. In it, they go thru and discuss what they think would be the most prudent on-line measures to take when initiating a break-up, and they even have a nice link to a previous article about facebook privacy that was really helpful too. Not that people break up a lot, but it's still a nice read in the event that you do need to sever ties and protect yourself from unrequited love.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:17
 
Things i've seen PDF Print E-mail
Written by Steven Sust   
Friday, 02 October 2009 10:56
  1. drag_me_to_hell_witchI thought Drag Me to Hell would be just another horror flick, but I was very wrong on that one. I came out of it pretty creeped out, but I think the movie did a great job of ramping up your fear response by first tapping into that feeling of disgust and nausea associated with bodily fluids. Once the hairs on the back of your neck are up, I think it's fairly easy for the movie to eat away at your amygdala. Without giving away any more, I will say that the movie did a great job of freaking me out when I watched it by myself at night with all of the windows open. This is probably not one of those movies Iwould share with Christina.




  2. U2 came into town yesterday evening and it was the first time I had ever heard them outside of a pair of speakers or headphones and I was surprised by how good they were. Over the years, I've gotten so used to listening to the finished product of voice enhancing machines that I forgot what the concert experience was like. The visual effects were pretty cool and psychedelic at times, but very well played in the moonlit sky. My biggest regret was not taking my camera along with me because I thought that there wouldnt be any photography allowed nor anything to photograph, but I was so wrong.

    U2_360


    I was getting a little irritated by Bono and his politics interrupting the music at first, but then I just thought of the apathetic youth that were surrounding me and realized that this really might be the only way to get through to them so I appalud his attempts to motivate these youngsters. Although I have a feeling that Aung San Suu Kyi's current plight/house arrest  will be rather quickly forgotten by the majority of the kids in attendance, at least a few might be motivated to action. I also couldnt believe that some people started leaving everytime Bono said good night because I wanted more music and expected an encore from these guys, but I guess it might have been a little too chilly for some of the audience.
    I still am not thrilled by U2's newest music, but I loved their older songs. Muse opened for U2 and it was... interesting. The kids loved their music, but I couldn't get into it. I can't put my finger on it, but I thought it was a little too angry and I like Linkin Park too. I'm sure I just need to hear them outside of the concert setting and it might grow on me then, but at the concert all I wanted to hear was U2.
  3.  

Last Updated on Friday, 02 October 2009 11:53
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Page 5 of 8